Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cp's avatar

Agree, this isn’t about waiting for a visionary to return—Jobs isn’t coming back, and the pixel-polish era is over. But I protest the framing that leaves us only two choices: lament the loss or embrace the chaos.

The future is not binary. It’s a spectrum. A field of unfolding probabilities.

The real challenge is that people crave simplicity—boom or doom, Jobs or junkware—but the world isn’t built like that. It’s complex, adaptive, 4D—think Death’s End, not Black Mirror.

We don’t need another product messiah. We need to learn how to co-orchestrate emergence.

Not just tools, but stories. Not just prompts, but systems of care.

No more binaries. The real work lies in the spectrum—in the messy middle, where design, meaning, and intelligence evolve together.

Expand full comment
Leandro Agro's avatar

Postscript to the article.

Someone — wise and generous — wrote to me privately:

“I don’t think everything else will just disappear.

We’ll still need complex systems, infrastructure, tools that serve collectives.

The idea that we’ll be left only with ephemeral apps feels like an oversimplification.”

You are right.

But the point of the piece wasn’t to predict.

It was to provoke. To name a risk: that software, politics, and digital culture may all be heading down the same path.

Social media? Trash.

Politics? Trash.

Software? …

Prompts as impulse. Apps as disposable gestures. Result: digital junk.

That’s not the future I want.

It’s not a place where I’d want to retire.

Let alone raise children.

And that’s exactly why we should talk about it—now.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts