Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rainbow Roxy's avatar

Love this perspective! Totally agree that Physical AI is the big turn now. Its about time hardware caught up with the mind.

Pancrazio Auteri's avatar

The "maker room to Chinese factory with almost nothing in between" line hit hard. That's exactly the valley of death nobody talks about when they romanticize hardware.

What struck me most is how you're framing software-defined architecture not as a methodology but as a mindset shift. I've watched too many hardware teams treat software as an afterthought - something bolted on after the mechanical design is frozen. The moment you flip that and start asking "what flexibility do we need to preserve in software" *before* committing to manufacturing decisions, everything changes. Suddenly you're designing for iteration instead of perfection.

The human-as-ultimate-interface point during the embodied intelligence panel is sneaky profound. We spent decades making humans adapt to machines (remember learning DOS commands?). Now we're finally building machines that adapt to environments we already shaped around ourselves. Makes you wonder if the whole "why humanoid robots" debate misses the point - it's not about mimicry, it's about addressable market. Every doorway, staircase and light switch is already specced for a human form factor.

Curious how you see the edge intelligence piece evolving. Marine AI with no network fallback is the extreme test case, but seems like most industrial applications will live in this hybrid space - some local, some cloud, constantly negotiating what computation happens where based on latency and criticality.

No posts

Ready for more?